Discover below the most common names given to people in Brazil.

1. Maria - It comes from the Hebrew word Myriam. It has diverse interpretations: “the one that desire a child”, sovereign, lady, “drop of the sea” or same rebellion, among others. The origin also can be related to the Egyptian mry, loved.
2. Ana
3. João - This name comes from the Hebrew name Yohanan and means “God pardons”, “God is merciful” or still “God is benevolent”. It was the name of diverse kings, Popes and emperors throughout history.
4. Matheus - Name of one of the twelve apostles of Jesus, in the Bible. It comes of Hebrew Matthaeus (“Dom of God”).
5. Pedro - Popular name because of Apostle Peter
6. Gabriel
7. Luiz
8. Gustavo
9. Guilherme
10. Júlia - The name for a boy is Júlio. It comes of the Latin name Julius, it is the name of an important family of the Old Rome, that said to be descending of Jupiter, supreme god in Mythology Roman.
11. Kauã
12. Lucas - It comes from the Greek name Loukas.
13. Luís
14. Mariana
15. Nicolas
16. Rafael
17. Vinícius - Of the Latin name Vinicius, that drift of vinum (wine). Also interpreted as “that one that cultivates grape”.
18. Daniel - It means “God is my judge”, of the Hebrew Dan-El.
19. Felipe - Variation of Filipe. Of the Greek philippos, that is, “friend of the horses”.
20. Gabriela - The male version of this name is Gabriel
21. Kaíque - Possibly of the eskimo kayak, type of wooden boat. Others translate as “aquatic bird”, of tupi.
22. Samuel - It means “that one to who God heard” or “name of God”, of the Hebrew Shemu’el.
23. Bruno
24. Filipe - Of the Greek philippos, that is, “friend of the horses”.
25. Francisco - The origin is in the tribe of Franks (of Latin francus, that is, “free man”), that it lived in the Germânia and it emigrated to the Gália in century IV. They had given origin to the French people. The name, therefore, is interpreted as “free” or simply French man.
26. Gabrieli - it wants to say “force of God”, “man of God” or still “envoy of God”.
27. Giovanna - This name wants to say “God is merciful” or “God is benevolent” in Hebrew.
28. Luan - Name invented recently. Possibly a variation of Luna, that wants to say moon in Latin.
29. Miguel - It means “God is incomparable”, of the Hebrew Mikha-El. Name of arcanjo that in the Old Will it defeated the Satan, according to Biblical ticket.
30. Victor - It means winner, of Latin Victor.

Posted in Articles

When naming your baby, one fear may be that your child will grow up hating the name you choose. Relax. Psychological studies consistently show that happy, well adjusted people who like themselves also tend to like their names, no matter what they are and even if it takes a while.

Gertrude, for example, is commonly disliked by many children. One writer named Ann Bayer confessed in Seventeen magazine several years ago that as a little girl she absolutely abhorred her middle name Gertrude: “when I confided it to anyone ,the reaction was always the same :as screech of horror followed by giggles followed by a sympathetic glance and then a final snort of amusement.” But as this woman grew up and came to fully appreciate her own uniqueness, she also grew to like her middle name. She writes, “I can ‘t say that I’m crazy about its original German meaning ”spear maiden” but the name has a certain headstrongness, a Kind of I’m - Gertrude - wanna – make – something- of – it quality that appeals to me. Whenever I write a story I always name the heroine Gertrude. It has become my hallmark, a code word for the part of me that’s most unique.”

It’s generally best not to inflict a humorous name on a child. Calling twins Pet and Repeat might be amusing at first, but the joke soon grows stale. Likewise, rhyming names such as Mary Perry or Ronson Johnson may make a child the butt of jokes at school. Still, even an odd name won’t necessarily cause a child to want to change it. Until his death in the 1950s, a Wisconsin man named Oofty Goofty Bowman (after a circus clown) insisted he always liked his name and never tried to conceal it by using initials.

Many children (especially teen-age girls) go through a stage when they dislike their name, no matter it is.

Girls named Tia and Krishna want more ordinary names; while those called Sara and Emily wish their names were more exotic. Though parents sometimes worry when their daughter suddenly wants to change her name, psychologist say this may actually be a sign of healthy growth: The adolescent is developing a strong, unique personal identity and part of this evolving independence may involve considering a whole new name.

Most kids, once they get through their rebellious teen- age years, settle down and come to love the names they once detested. But for those who don’t it’s fairly easy in most states to change one’s name by simply going to court. About 50,000 Americans change their names each year. Why some people choose the new names they do, however, often remains a mystery. A clerk in the New York State Supreme Court tells of a Mr. Murphy who had grown weary of his last name, which he found “too Irish and too common.” So he petitioned the court to change his name - to Kelly.

Posted in Psychology

Another old naming rule that’s now gone, thanks to recent research, is the notion that your Child’s name should clearly denote his or her sex. The old idea was that if you gave your child a sexually ambiguous name (like Robin, Lee, Dana, or Harper), he or she would have trouble establishing a sexual identity and would likely suffer serious psychological problems (a phenomenon Known as “the boy – named- Sue syndrome”).

This notion has now been discarded. In his carefully controlled studies of Wesleyan University students reported in 1980, Dr Zweigenhaft compared students with sexually ambiguous or misleading names (such as Dana, Leslie, and Ronnie) with students whose names were decidedly masculine or feminine. All the students had taken the California Psychological Inventory (CPI), which tests psychological health on eighteen scales. Students with unisex names were just as psychologically health as students whose names clearly denote their sex. As matter of fact, girls with sexually ambiguous names scored higher than other girls on “capacity for status,” whereas boys with unisex names scored higher than other boys on the “well – being” and “good impression” scales. Dr. Zweigenhaft’s conclusions are very clear. He writes, “There is no evidence in these data to support the dire predictions for the “boy- named – Sue syndrome.” Case closed.

What about naming your son after his father with “Jr.” attached? Research has generally shown this isn’t such a good Idea. Most studies have found boys intensely dislike being given their father’s name (although Dr. Busse did find in one study that boys named for their fathers liked their names and also got along well with other boys). Dr.Zweigenhaft found in his 1980 studies that juniors scored significantly lower than other boys on a number of psychological measures, including capacity for status, well- being, responsibility, tolerance, and intellectual efficiency.

It’s important to remember, of course, that such findings are for all juniors on average. Any one specific junior (Yours, for example) may actually score way above other boys in these areas. If you do name a son junior, the most important thing is to make sure your son has a sense of individuality. Thus, if a boy is named Thomas Jones, Jr., it’s advisable to give him a distinctive nickname (like T.J. for example) to emphasize the fact that he’s still unique and special.

Intriguingly, when Dr. Zweigenhaft looked at the psychological scores of boys named after their fathers, but whose junior status was designated with Roman numerals rather Jr., (as in John Smith II or John Rockefeller ), he found these boys were as well adjusted as boys not named for their fathers. Dr Zwegenhaft speculates that a boy with aII, III, or IV after his name may see himself as one link in a long chain of respected, admirable high achievers, and may therefore see himself as quite special. “In contrast,” he writes, “the person with Jr. attached to his name may or may not be part of a long line. His title reminds us, and him, that he is younger, most likely smaller (at least for the first 15 years of his life) and lesser in status than the real thing, the person he was named after.”

When you examine all the latest psychological findings about names, one fact becomes obvious: you needn’t worry about making some dreadful blunder when naming your baby. The latest scientific research has shown that choosing a name for your child is a lot less perilous and hence a lot more fun than psychologists of the past believed.

Posted in Psychology

Thirty to forty years ago, scientists thought an unusual, Distinctive name would make a child unpopular in school and harm her emotional development. It was thought that children with uncommon names like Riza or Blair would have fewer friends than children with ordinary names like Susan or David. Some experts even insisted an unusual name alone would launch a child on path of crime!

Happily, these silly notions have gone by the wayside. The most recent research reveals that, far from being a handicap, an unusual name can be quite an advantage. Clinical psychologist C.R. Snyder, co- author of Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference argues that a child’s name is one of his or her “uniqueness” traits. “To have self – esteem,” Dr. Snyder says, “all human beings have to feel special. If you make people too similar to others, you threaten their uniqueness and their self – esteem will take a nose–dive.” Dr. Snyder points out that any name helps a child establish a unique identity. But a distinctive name that makes a child stand out a little more from the crowd may actually help the child in his or her struggle to feel individual and special.

Sports heroes, singers, and film stars have long recognized the publicity value of having a distinctive name. Would Yogi Berra have been as memorable on and off the baseball diamond if he’d gone by his real name__ Lawrence Peter Berra? Would Cary Grant have been a sex symbol as Archie Leach? Or would Bo Derek have rated a “10” had she stayed Mary Cathleen Collins? Probably not.

Unusual names may be especially advantageous to a child born in the upper – middle or upper class. As Guilford College psychologist Richard Zwegenhaft notes in a Journal of Social Psychology article, a child already privileged by birth may see his distinctive name as just another positive way he stands out. Research on upper- class children who go on to fulfill their promise of birth strongly supports this theory. To see whether an unusual name had any effect on later success, Dr. Zweigenhaft chose 436 male names at random from The Social Register, which has been called the “best guide to the membership of the national upper class.” Half the men had unusual first names like Urie and Cornell, whereas the other half had common ones like William and John. Of those thirty men who actually went on to become listed in Who’s Who, twenty – three or a whopping 77 percent came from the group with unusual names.

Past studies showed that children with unusual names did worse on IQ tests and had lower self – esteem. Again, more recent studies have not born this out. Indeed, one study reported in The Journal of Social Psychology found unusually named college women actually scored higher on many variables, including capacity for status, sociability, social presence, and self – acceptance, than did women with ordinary names.

Nor should you worry that giving your child an unusual name will make her unpopular. One often – reported 1966 study did suggest that kids with uncommon names might be less popular with their peers. But that study included only fifty- nine children (all Jewish) who knew one another. In a much more extensive study done in 1979, Dr. Busse looked at 1,548 children from many racial, ethnic, and religious backgrounds. Comparing kids with ordinary names to chose with unusual ones, he found no relation between a child’s first name and her popularity. There is simply no proof that a special, unique, or distinctive name will doom your child to a life of unpopularity.

Lest we replace the myth that an unusual name always harms a child with a new myth that an unusual name never hurts, however, we should point put that there’s a clear difference between giving a child a downright comical name like Ima Pigg or Hong Fong Dong (which is bound to provoke vicious teasing from schoolmates) and a pretty or distinctive name like Kala or Jared, which will likely just help a child feel more special.

Posted in Psychology

When reading about names, you’ll invariably read of a study done by psychologists John w. Mcdavid and Herbert Harari, which supposedly “proves” you’d better give your child a popular name if you want her to do well in school. The more you think about it, the more worrisome this pronouncement may become. After all, what exactly is a popular name? No one really knows. The fact is, name fads shift often quite dramatically from year to year.

Let’s look at this study closer to see what was actually found. MacDavid and Harari asked eighty elementary school teachers to grade short paragraphs written by fifth- and sixth- graders. The essays were all on the topic ” What I Did All Day Last Sunday.” Supposedly, the only difference in these “comparable” essays was that four names on the tests (David, Michael, Lisa, and Karen) were “popular” among the teachers, whereas the other four names ( Elmer, Hubert, Adelle, and Bertha) were ” unpopular.” Papers by Michael or David received a full grade higher than those by Elmer or Hubert. And Karen and Lisa were given a grade and a half higher than the supposedly outcast, unpopular Bertha.

But there are major problems with this study if you take it as serious “proof” (as do many authors of popular articles and books about names) that you’d better give your child a familiar, “popular,” or socially “desirable” name if you want her to do well in school.

First , one of the so-called undesirable names Adelle actually received the highest grade of all. This finding, if reported at all, is generally skipped over with the lame excuse that the teachers probably considered the name Adelle “scholarly” and “academic.” But the fact that Adelle did get a better grade than the popularly named kids leaves the often-drawn conclusion that kids with uncommon or out - of - vogue names do poorly in school open to question.

Second, what if this study which has been cited adnauseum as “proof” against unpopular names was, in fact flawed? Suppose Lisa’s essay really was subtly better in some way than Bertha’s, and Lisa’s higher grade had little, if anything, to do with her first name. Writers who report this study seldom bother to tell you that the essays were not the same. David wrote about “the store,” Michael about “Tarzan,” Elmer about “The Anniversary,” and Hubert about “Kites.” Adelle wrote about “shopping” and Lisa about “Walking the Dogs.” Bertha ’s topic was ” Planting Seeds” (hardly the liveliest subject).As researchers Louisa Seraydarian and Thomas V. Busse point out in The Journal of Psychology, not only is it possible that the essays weren’t comparable, but the teachers in the McDavid-Harari study also weren’t given any specific criteria for grading the essays. The vaguer and more unspecified a task, Drs. Seraydarian and Busse note, “the more likely it is that irrelevancies (e.g., first names) might affect the task.”

Third, to be accepted as a scientific “fact,” a study has to be reproduced and the same results found by other teams of scientists. Yet in 1981 when Drs. Seraydarian and Busse,then at Temple University, tried to duplicate the McDavid Harari findings, they couldn’t. In the Temple University study which involved 60 children’s names, 10 essays, and 180 teachers popular or unpopular names had no good or bad effects on the grades fifth-graders received. Though the children’s names were prominently displayed on the papers, many teachers later admitted they hadn’t even noticed them. In short, no psychologist can say with great certainty that you should call your little boy David or Michael (as opposed to Hubert) if you want him to do well in school. Until scientists prove that a child’s first name can seriously affect what grades he receives, it seems wisest just to choose the name you like best.

Posted in Psychology

Articles about names often note that, whether you like it or not, others will judge and stereotype your child by her name. Depending on the study cited, you’ll see that people generally consider:
Bertha a “fat” name, Brian “macho and dynamic,” Justin “vigorous,
Rebecca ” sweet,” April “sprightly,” Kevin “popular and virile”
Harvey “somewhat of a klutz,” Percy “is reportedly a “weak” name,
Whereas Eric is perceived as “very strong.”

In a 1963 study reported in the British Journal of Psychiatry, a British psychologist found that John is nearly always thought to be trustworthy, Robin young, and Tony sociable. Agnes and Matilda were considered unattractive, Ann passive. The most unusual name in this study-Grizelda-received the largest number of mixed ratings, a phenomenon the researcher chalked up to the fact that people probably had no views either way. When asked whether Grizelda was trustworthy, sociable, or kind, respondents jotted down “yes” “no” more or less at random. This finding suggests that unusual and rare names are less quickly stereotyped. In other words, a child with a distinctive name may be able to “write her own meanings” on her name more easily than a child given a common name people already have many preconceived notions about.

Other common girls’ names and their stereotypes (drawn from several different studies) include:

*Amanda - cultured
*Amy - active
*Angela - attractive and a bit willful
*Ann - ladylike and honest but rather plain
*Emily - a wallflower
*Jennifer - young but old - fashionable
*Jessica - beautiful and ambitious
*Katharine - determined, strong-willed,and pretty
*Lisa - popular but frail
*Margaret - trustworthy and kind but a bit dowdy
*Mary - womanly. Active, and wholesome
*Patricia - Plain - looking
*Vicky - very sexy and popular

Stereotypes for boys’ names include:

*Anthony - tall, thin, and elegant
*Benjamin - not to be trusted
*Charles - popular and masculine but not very athletic
*Christopher - intelligent and hardworking
*Cyril - old and unattractive
*David - good, strong,wise,serious,sociable,masculine
*Harold - weak, foolish, passive, and humorless
*Ian - young and honest but unaggressive
*James - an all -around winner
*Kevin - virile and quite popular
*Robert - shy and lacking in confidence
*William - honest but unattractive and unassertive

What can you make of these “results” and other stereotypes?

Some “experts” imply that giving your baby an unpopular name like Bertha or Harold may handicap your child for life. They argue that we tend to see ourselves as others see us, and so a name with negative connotations can hamper a child’s emotional development. Such warnings can be particularly angst-provoking for parents who take them seriously. Shouldn’t you be quiet concerned about saddling your child with a negatively stereotyped name? No. When naming your baby, there are several reasons not to take “findings” like those mentioned above too seriously.

For one thing, overly simplified stereotypes like these reveal only how a bunch of people viewed these names on average. When you look at the research more closely, you find that nearly every name had both advocates and detractors. In British Journal of Psychiatry study, for example, only 35 percent of the people polled though a boy named William would be good- looking, but those 35 percent did think he’d be handsome. (And let’s face it, anytime any of us has a trait, talent, or ability one in three people applauds, we’re doing pretty well.) Also, such stereotypes apply only to names in the abstract; once anyone actually meets bright- eyed, perky, adorable baby Wiliam, any preconceived negative ideas about his looks will no doubt instantly vanish. Also, name “images” change over time. Now that England has a cute Prince William, a lot more people will probably stereotype the name as “cute”.
Another reason not to take such findings too seriously is that stereotypes can vary considerably on some scores depending on how the name is spelled (suggesting these generalities about names are hardly set in stone). Intriguingly, 90 percent of those in a British study thought a girl named Ann would be young. But when an e was added, making the name Anne, the number who considered her young plunged to 78 percent. Would Lynda be rated as “feminine and energetic” as Linda has been? Would Caren, Karin, Karen, and Caryn each be stereotyped in exactly the same ways? If the findings of this study are any indication, probably not.

How people stereotype a name also depends on whether they perceive the bearer as upper-, middle-, or lower-class. Dr. Richard L. Zweigenhaft, a psychologist at Guilford College in Greensboro, North Carolina, asked his psychology students to judge a number of names, including Mckinley and Talmadge. Mckinley was generally rated as “upper- class,” “overconfident,” “intolerant,” and “cold” the picture of aristocratic insensitivity and aloofness. In contrast, Talmadge was considered “lower-class,” “bad,” “weak,” “stupid,” “uncertain,” “weak- willed,” “cowardly” in short, everything unpleasant. But the ratings changed dramatically, depending on whether the students thought the baby’s father was an unemployed laborer or a physician. If the father was a physician, the name Mckinley was rated as more “good,” whereas Talmadge was considered more “strong” and “strong-willed” than if the students believed the father was an unemployed laborer.

Also, name stereotyping studies rarely if ever take into account the effect of nicknames. How, for example would the stereotypes of Mckinley’s name change if all his friends called him Mack? Or what if Talmadge was often called just Tal?

As you can see, there are countless subtle variables to consider before you can say with any certainty that Harold is a “bad” name and James is a “good” one. In fact, so many variables contribute to stereotyping that it’s really not worth worrying too much about it. Certainly, if you read that a certain name Cyril, for example was rated very negatively by nearly everyone (as, unfortunately, Cyril was in one study), you might want to avoid that name or consider using a shorter version or alternative spelling, such as Cyrill or Cy. Generally, though, most names get such as mixed reviews that the findings are of more use to scientists who are trying to devise more name studies than they are to you as a parent. No scientist yet has ever found that calling a baby Cyril or any other name will doom him to an unhappy future or that calling a boy David will guarantee his future success.

Posted in Stereotypes

After working hard to build her career as a lawyer, Joanne is about to have her first baby at age Thirty-five. Not content with just one book, she’s brought home armloads of books from library and has even dug out half a dozen magazine articles on how to choose the best name for her baby.

Unfortunately, the more Joanne reds, the more uncertain she feels. “Several articles say the name I choose can affect the grade my child will get in school,” Joanne says. “I don’t honestly see how a child’s name alone could affect how her teachers treat her…but, still, I do worry. Also, if my baby’s a girl, I was thinking of calling her Kayla or Shanna, but then I saw a psychologist quoted who insists unusually named kids are unpopular and have emotional problems. I don’t know. Maybe I should just listen to my mother. She wants me to call the baby Kathy or Michael.”

Joanne is hardly alone. Many thoughtful, loving parents are concerned about the psychological impact a particular name may have on their baby’s future. Clearly, our names are important to us. Scientists have observed that when you hear your own name spoken -even when you’re asleep- your brain waves become twice as active as when you hear someone else’s name. The psychologist Gordon Allport contended that a child’s name is the focal point around which he organizes his self - identity throughout life. But what does modern psychological research tell us about choosing the very best name for a baby? What are the pros and cons, for example, of giving your baby an unusual name like Shanna rather than a common one like Kathy? Can the same name you choose affect your baby’s future school grades or emotional development (as some so- called experts ominously warn)? Should you play it safe and opt for an ordinary name like Dick or Jane?

When trying to answer such complex questions, it’s not nearly enough to simply glance at findings from one or two poorly designed name studies done twenty or thirty years ago and then try to draw up guidelines for naming your baby (which is what far too many “experts” intent on drawing up hard- and - fast naming rules have done). Findings from a scientific study done in lab, while frequently interesting, don’t always translate directly and easily to hard- and - fast naming “how-to’s” in the real world. So let’s analyze the latest scientific findings about the psychology of names to see what this research tells you (if anything) about how to choose the very best name for your special baby.

Posted in Psychology

If you are looking for a Brazilian baby name you are in the right place.

Brazilian baby names are used almost everywhere in the world.

Everybody loves a Brazilian name; they are unique and very exotic.

The Brazilian language is Portuguese and Portuguese is a romance language which is derived from Latin, the Portuguese language accomplishes full purpose and it is a beautiful language full of nuances and softness.
Since tourism in Brazil became very popular because of the beauty attractions, a lot of the tourists became passionate about the country, the warm people and the language, so a lot of tourists wanted to name their kids with a Brazilian name. Brazilian names are also full of strength and romance.

Another great thing is that Brazilians have immigrants from every where in the world. So, its is very common to find Italian, Japanese , Greek , Polish , Spanish and other people living there. The most common last names are from Portugal such as Souza, Araujo, Silva, Machado, Cruz, Ferreira, Santos , Oliveira, Almeida and etc…

Also in Brazil many last names originated from the native Indians and Africans.

The Knowledge of surnames and given names will help you to find and determine and identify the descendants.

In Brazil some given names are from the bible such as Jose’ ( Joseph) and names of saints as Roque (Roch)
Some Brazilians use combo given names and can be found with or without preposition ( da ,de, do , d’ ) as Maria Isabel, Izabel da Conceicao, Maria das Dores, Joao Pedro da costa, Ana Maria, Jose’ da Silva and more…

Brazilian names are beautiful and here are some for you to choose:

In 2006, these were the names that had been registered in the Brazilian notary’s offices. The list shows the that the classics are the preferred ones currently.

It is also good to know the meaning of them:

Girls
Maria - Lady and sovereign
Ana - Full of favor
Julia -Full of energy
Giovanna - Young
Mariana - Junction of Maria and Ana
Leticia - Joy
Yasmin - Flower of jasmim
Beatriz - That one that makes others happy
Bianca - White, clear
Gabriela - Envoy of God

Boys
João - God is gracious
Gabriel - Envoy of God
Pedro - Rock, rock
Matheus - Man of God
Vinicius - That one that cultivates grape
Lucas - Luminous
Luiz - Fighter
Guillerme - The protector
Rafael - Cured for God
Davi - The loved one

Other Popular Brazilian Baby Names

Boys

1. Lucas

2. Gustavo

3. Rodrigo

4. Renato

5. Fabio

6. Felipe

7. Miguel

8. Daniel

9. Julio

10. Luiz

Girls

1. Bruna

2. Claudia

3. Luiza

4. Fernanda

5. Maria

6. Carla

7. Eliana

8. Laura

9. Gabriela

10.Carolina

Posted in introduction